WNDW vs Neo Intelligence.
Neo Intelligence is an Australian construction platform focused on workforce: scheduling, timesheets, payroll, and EBA and award interpretation, with site diaries and configurable site forms alongside. Their published verticals are concrete placement, concrete pumping, formwork, steel fixing and civil — labour-heavy trades where the wages bill is the business.
Where Neo is better.
Award and EBA interpretation
This is the hardest problem in Australian construction payroll and Neo has built for it. WNDW does not compete here and doesn't intend to.
Payroll integration
Mature, and central to the product rather than bolted on.
Drag-and-drop crew scheduling
WNDW has no equivalent.
Site diaries with photos pinned to drawings
Good evidence capture for delays and disruption.
Case study depth
Quantified customer outcomes across a range of named trades.
Where WNDW is different.
Neo's site forms are templates. Flexible, configurable, and fine for "did the pour pass the slump test." They don't actually track installed items.
What Neo tracks
A form template. Flexible and configurable.
What WNDW tracks
The opening. A level holds 84 items, each with a stage, a rate and a value.
Ask a facade subbie to track 1,010 openings across two towers, each moving through four stages, each carrying a rate, and a form-based approach forces the job into a shape it doesn't fit. WNDW is built around it.
Openings, not forms
Stages, hold points and per-opening tracking are built in, so completion produces countable installed quantity.
Claims come out of it
Progress claims against a schedule of rates, generated from what was signed off.
Offline-first
WNDW is built for basements and podium levels where signal drops out entirely.
Builder-facing project sharing
A read-only project view a head contractor can open without an account.
Note where Neo's verticals stop: concrete, formwork, steel fixing, civil. No facade, glazing, curtain wall or waterproofing. That isn't an oversight — those trades carry per-component compliance burdens that generic forms handle badly. It's exactly the gap WNDW was built for.
Coexistence is reasonable.
If you're running a large workforce under an EBA and also installing countable envelope work, these two products solve different halves. Neo for scheduling, timesheets and payroll; WNDW for openings, ITPs, variations and claims. They don't collide.
Which one should you pick.
Pick Neo if
Labour is your dominant cost and complexity — crews, rosters, awards, payroll.
Pick WNDW if
You're an envelope or finishes subcontractor and the problem is per-component compliance and getting the claim right.
Pick both if
You're honestly both — labour-heavy work and countable envelope installs across the same jobs.
See the difference yourself.
Bring your last claim. We'll walk through what it looks like when the ITP and the claim come from the same record.
Get in TouchComparison based on Neo Intelligence's publicly published product, industry and case study pages. If anything here is out of date, tell us at [email protected] and we'll correct it.